Sister brands, sibling watches
Tudor is wholly-owned by Rolex SA and shares manufacturing infrastructure. Tudor was founded by Hans Wilsdorf (Rolex's founder) in 1926 specifically to produce dive watches at lower price points; the strategy held.
Today the BB58 is Tudor's 39mm vintage-leaning diver, while the Submariner 124060 is the 41mm modern reference. Both share screwed-down crown architecture, COSC-grade movements (Tudor MT5402 and Rolex Cal. 3230), and dive-watch heritage from the same Geneva backyard.
Spec sheet
| Attribute | Tudor Black Bay 58 | Rolex Submariner (no-date) |
|---|---|---|
| Reference | 79030N | 124060 |
| Case diameter | 39mm × 11.9mm | 41mm × 12.5mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | 904L Oystersteel |
| Bezel insert | Black aluminium (gloss) | Black Cerachrom (ceramic) |
| Water resistance | 200m | 300m |
| Movement | Cal. MT5402 (in-house) | Cal. 3230 (in-house) |
| Reserve | 70 hours | 70 hours |
| Beat rate | 28,800 vph (4 Hz) | 28,800 vph (4 Hz) |
| Antimagnetic hairspring | Silicon | Parachrom |
| Bracelet | Riveted-look steel | Oyster 904L |
| Retail price | ~€3,910 | ~€10,500 (allocation-only) |
| Secondary market | At retail | Premium over retail |
€3,910 vs €10,500: where the gap goes
The Submariner is built from 904L Oystersteel (more corrosion-resistant than 316L), has a Cerachrom ceramic bezel insert (scratch-proof vs the BB58's aluminium), is rated to 300m vs 200m water resistance, includes the Glidelock clasp extension, and runs a Parachrom hairspring. The BB58 has aluminium bezel, 200m, no extension clasp, and silicon hairspring. The €6,500 gap buys: ceramic, 904L, depth rating, clasp, brand.
Wrist: 39mm vs 41mm
The BB58 sits in vintage proportion (39mm × 11.9mm); the modern Sub at 41mm × 12.5mm wears slightly bigger. For wrists 6.25-7", BB58 fits more naturally; 7" and up, both work but the Sub feels more substantial. Lug-to-lug is also a factor: BB58 47mm vs Sub 47.5mm, similar.
Allocation vs at-retail
The Submariner has been on multi-year waitlists since 2020. Authorised dealers won't quote a delivery date. Secondary market sits 1.3-1.6x retail. The BB58 is at MSRP at any AD with weekly stock turnover. If you walk into a retailer and want to leave with a watch, BB58 is the answer.
Pros and cons
- Available at retail; no waitlist
- Silicon hairspring (antimagnetic)
- 70h reserve same as Sub
- Vintage gilt aesthetic
- €6,500 cheaper than Sub at retail
- Aluminium bezel insert (less scratch-resistant than Cerachrom)
- 200m vs Sub's 300m water resistance
- No bracelet extension clasp
- Less brand-status signal than the Sub
- 904L Oystersteel case
- Cerachrom (ceramic) bezel insert
- 300m water resistance
- Glidelock extension clasp
- Cultural status as the original luxury diver
- Allocation-only at AD; multi-year wait
- 1.3-1.6x retail on secondary market
- €6,500 retail premium over the BB58
Verdict: which one?
If you want a wearable everyday-diver you can buy now: BB58. Same factory, similar movement architecture, gilt vintage feel, €3,910.
If you have AD allocation history and want the cultural reference: Submariner 124060. Cerachrom + 904L + 300m + the brand. €10,500 retail is fair if you can actually buy one.
For most buyers, the answer is BB58 first. Many buyers eventually own both: the BB58 for daily wear and the Submariner as an aspirational acquisition years later. They are sibling watches; not direct competitors.
Comments 2